Wiggins v. Shaffer et al
Jerry Wiggins |
Scotty Shaffer and Attorney General of the State of Alabama |
2:2022cv00494 |
April 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
Herman N Johnson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Jerry Wiggins. (KEK) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Accordingly, the court ORDERS Wiggins to SHOW CAUSE within 14 days of the entry date of this Order why his petition should not be dismissed as successive due to his failure to obtain the requisite authorization from the Eleventh Circuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 5/16/2022. (KEK) |
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number B4601119870. (KEK) |
Filing 2 ORDER - Petitioner Jerry Wiggins filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. (Doc. #1 ). The petition is deficient for the following reason: The petitioner has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee of $5. The petitioner must file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee of $5 to the Clerk of Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 4/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP form)(KEK) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jerry Wiggins.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.