Julien v. Equifax Information Services LLC et al
| Crystal Julien |
| Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions Inc, Trans Union LLC, Midland Credit Management Inc and Midland Funding LLC |
| 2:2022cv00624 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Experian Information Solutions Inc. filed by Experian Information Solutions Inc (Young, L) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint by Experian Information Solutions Inc.(Young, L) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to File Answer Out of Time by Experian Information Solutions Inc. (Young, L) |
Filing 12
ORDER - To date, Experian has not responded to Ms. Julien's complaint. Accordingly, on or before July 22, 2022, Ms. Julien shall either move for entry of default or show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Experian for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 7/8/2022. (KEK)
|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint Equifax Information Services LLC's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint and Affirmative and Other Defenses by Equifax Information Services LLC.(Phillips, Brock) |
|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER: The Court grants Equifax's second unopposed motion for an extension of time until June 27, 2022 to respond to Ms. Julien's complaint. (Doc. #9 ). Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 6/13/2022. (KEK)
|
| Filing 9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Phillips, Brock) |
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Trans Union LLC. filed by Trans Union LLC (Robinett, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Trans Union LLC.(Robinett, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint and Defenses by Midland Credit Management Inc, Midland Funding LLC.(DeBray, Thomas) |
|
Filing 5
HAIKALA CHAMBERS INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 5/20/2022. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER: The Court grants Equifax's motion for an extension of time until June 13, 2022 to respond to Ms. Julien's complaint. (Doc. #2 ). Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 5/19/2022. (KEK)
|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Equifax Information Services LLC. filed by Equifax Information Services LLC (Phillips, Brock) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time Consent Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Phillips, Brock) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4086455 (ALND B4601120291) related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Midland Credit Management Inc, Midland Funding LLC from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-cv-2022-901064. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(KEK). (Tompkins, Jason) Modified on 5/17/2022 (KEK). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Midland Credit Management Inc, Midland Funding LLC from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-cv-2022-901064. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(KEK) |
| State court complaint deemed filed 4/11/2022. See Doc #1 , Exhibit 2, pages 2-29. (KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
