Harrell v. Walmart Inc
| Diane Harrell |
| Walmart Inc |
| 2:2022cv00643 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
NOTICE: Telephone conference set for July 12, 2022 is CANCELLED. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 10
INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 07/08/2022. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 9
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge (AKD)
|
|
Filing 8
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Walmart Inc. filed by Walmart Inc (Zulanas, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26(f). Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 06/14/2022. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than July 28, 2022. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after July 28, 2022. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for July 12, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-873-8017 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 4577302. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 06/14/2022. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Walmart Inc.(Zulanas, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Diane Harrell. Walmart Inc served on 5/24/2022, answer due 6/14/2022. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Walmart Inc. Sent via certified mail. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF CONSENT to a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Walmart Inc, filed by Diane Harrell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(AKD)
|
|
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4088500 (ALND receipt# B4601120343). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Walmart Inc, filed by Diane Harrell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(AKD). (Whitten, Austin) Modified on 5/18/2022 (AKD).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harrell v. Walmart Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diane Harrell | |
| Represented By: | Austin Brock Whitten |
| Represented By: | Michael C Bradley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart Inc | |
| Represented By: | Christopher J Zulanas |
| Represented By: | Gwen K Arendall Gordon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
