Madsen v. R&L Foods, LLC et al
| Amber Madsen |
| R&L Foods, LLC and William Richard Reynolds |
| 2:2022cv00854 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Nicholas A Danella |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amber Madsen. R&L Foods, LLC served on 8/26/2022, answer due 9/16/2022; William Richard Reynolds served on 8/29/2022, answer due 9/19/2022. (AKD) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Sent to USM for service. (DNW) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Madsen's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file this action without prepayment of a fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 7/15/2022. (MEB2)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR TRIAL. You must complete the attached form to indicate whether you consent to proceed before the assigned magistrate judge or decline to proceed before the assigned magistrate judge. (DNW) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Amber Madsen. (DNW) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Amber Madsen.(DNW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
