Hulsey v. Dan Sullivan Trucking, Inc. et al
| Rhonda Hulsey |
| Dan Sullivan Trucking, Inc., Danny Edward Larimore and GEICO Casualty Company |
| 2:2022cv00876 |
| July 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Anna M Manasco |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER Governing All Further Proceedings - with Appendices I, II and III attached. Signed by Judge Anna M Manasco on 8/29/2022. (FNC)
|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by GEICO Casualty Company. filed by GEICO Casualty Company (Dowdy, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 GEICO Casualty Company's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by GEICO Casualty Company.(Dowdy, Kenneth) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dan Sullivan Trucking, Inc.. filed by Dan Sullivan Trucking, Inc. (Whitaker, Richard) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Danny Edward Larimore.(Whitaker, Richard) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Dan Sullivan Trucking, Inc..(Whitaker, Richard) |
| Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number B115. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-CV-2022-901765. (Attachments: #1 exh. 1, #2 exh. 2)(DNW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
