Reeves et al v. Singleton et al
| James Reeves and Lisa Kline |
| Singleton, Sellers and Brookside, Town of |
| 2:2022cv01174 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Nicholas A Danella |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Brookside, Town of. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Arrest Warrants, #2 Exhibit Reeves Bail, #3 Exhibit Motion to Dismiss, #4 Exhibit Kline Bail, #5 Exhibit Deposition & Arrest Report)(Kinney, Richard) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Reeves. Brookside, Town of served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. (JLC) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Town of Brookside, via certified U.S. Mail on this the 17th day of October, 2022. (JLC) |
| Filing 4 Request for service by certified mail filed by James Reeves. (McCants, Terrell) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Sellers and Singleton. Returned to plaintiff for service. (DNW) |
| Filing Fee received in the amount of $402.00, Credit Card receipt_number AALNDC-4182617, USDC/NDAL receipt #1441. (McCants, Terrell) Modified on 10/4/2022 (JLC). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR TRIAL (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brookside, Town of, Sellers, Singleton, filed by James Reeves, Lisa Kline.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
