Williams v. Chevron Store 209084
Plaintiff: Billy G Williams
Defendant: Chevron Store 209084
Case Number: 2:2022cv01353
Filed: October 24, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Annemarie Carney Axon
Referring Judge: John H England
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 FINAL ORDER Consistent with the memorandum opinion, the court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 11/18/2022. (KSS)
November 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 11/18/2022. (KSS)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Case Reassigned to Judge Annemarie Carney Axon. Magistrate Judge John H England, III no longer assigned to the case. Please use case number 2:22-cv-1353-ACA on all subsequent pleadings. (KSS)
November 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REASSIGNMENT ORDER It appears this case is due to be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, due to plaintiff's failure to prosecute. However, the undersigned lacks dispositive jurisdiction to dismiss the case and will not be able to obtain the consent of all parties to exercise dispositive jurisdiction. Therefore, consistent with the General Order of Referral, the Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign the case to a District Judge for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 11/15/2022. (KSS)
November 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE-Williams is again ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by November 16, 2022, why this court has subject matter jurisdiction over his claims. Failure to file a response by that deadline may result in dismissal of Williams' claims for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 11/09/2022. (AKD) .
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE-Williams is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing by November 7, 2022, why this court has subject matter jurisdiction over his claims. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 10/24/2022. (AKD)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF CONSENT to a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AKD)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 10/24/2022. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Billy G Williams. (AKD)
October 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chevron Store 209084, filed by Billy G Williams.(AKD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Chevron Store 209084
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Billy G Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chevron Store 209084
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?