Weaver v. University of Alabama at Birmingham et al
Brittany Weaver |
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Evelyn Jones, Marquell Oliver, Johnney Bell and University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital |
2:2022cv01421 |
November 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Staci G Cornelius |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER DENYING #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel; GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Moreover, Ms. Weaver is ORDERED to file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) calendar days from the entry date of this order. Service of process will not begin until an amended complaint complying with this order is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 12/21/2022. (AKD) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CONSENT to a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AKD) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 11/8/2022. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Brittany Weaver. (AKD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Johnney Bell, Evelyn Jones, Marquell Oliver, University of Alabama at Birmingham, University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, filed by Brittany Weaver.(AKD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.