Kimbrough v. Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC
Shalaria Shade Kimbrough |
Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC |
2:2022cv01554 |
December 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 12/15/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 2/15/2024. Status Conference is set for 1/8/2024 at 10:30 AM in CR 7B of the Hugo L Black US Courthouse, Birmingham, AL before Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala.This case shall be ready for trial by August 2024. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 3/20/2023.(DNW) |
Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Han, Susan) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel B. Harris on behalf of Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC (Harris, Daniel) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC. filed by Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC (Palmer, Lynlee) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC.(Palmer, Lynlee) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Shalaria Shade Kimbrough. Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC waiver sent on 12/20/2022, answer due 2/18/2023. (Han, Susan) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC on December 20, 2022 by Shalaria Shade Kimbrough. Waiver of Service due by 1/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Form 1 B Waiver of Service of Summons, #2 Supplement Complaint, #3 Supplement Exhibit A to Complaint, #4 Supplement Exhibit B to Complaint)(Han, Susan) |
Filing 2 HAIKALA CHAMBERS INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 12/20/2022. (DNW) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4233854 rcpt. no B-2860). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC filed by Shalaria Shade Kimbrough. (Attachments: # 1 exh. a, # 2 exh. b)(DNW). (Han, Susan) Modified on 12/20/2022 (DNW). |
Request for service by certified mail in body of the complaint filed by Shalaria Shade Kimbrough.(DNW) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC filed by Shalaria Shade Kimbrough. (Attachments: #1 exh. a, #2 exh. b)(DNW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kimbrough v. Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shalaria Shade Kimbrough | |
Represented By: | Susan Nettles Han |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Royal Switchgear Manufacturing Company, LLC | |
Represented By: | Lynlee Wells Palmer |
Represented By: | Daniel B. Harris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.