Hankins v. Jenkins, et al
| Denzel Hankins |
| Jenkins and Mr Murray |
| 2:2022cv01590 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Anna M Manasco |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER TO REINSTATE CASE - Based on the foregoing, the court construes the complaint assigned Case No. 2:22-cv-1590-AMM-HNJ as a Motion to Reinstate Case No. 2:22-cv-407-LSC-HNJ, GRANTS Hankins's motion, VACATES the Order of Dismissal entered October 18, 2022 (Case No. 22-407 Doc. 7 ), and REINSTATES Case No. 2:22-cv-407-LSC-HNJ. Accordingly, the court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to remove the complaint filed in Case No. 2:22-cv-1590-AMM-HNJ, file that document as a Motion to Reinstate in Case No. 2:22-cv-407-LSC-HNJ, and CLOSE the case assigned Case No. 2:22-cv-1590-AMM-HNJ. As the court previously granted Hankins's application to proceed in forma pauperis in Case No. 2:22-cv-407-LSC-HNJ, the court DENIES AS MOOT Hankins's application to proceed in forma paupers in Case No. 2:22-cv-1590-AMM-HNJ (Doc. #2 ). Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 1/17/2023. (MEB2)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Denzel Hankins. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jenkins, Murray, filed by Denzel Hankins.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
