Thomas v. Wal Mart, Inc.
| Lucinda Thomas |
| Wal Mart, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv00068 |
| January 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Nicholas A Danella |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 3/16/23. (SAC)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER: Ms. Thomas SHALL file a response to Wal-Mart's motion to dismiss on or before March 27, 2023 or the court will dismiss this action for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 3/16/2023. (KAM)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT; The parties having not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable Annemarie Carney Axon. Please use case number 2:23-CV-0068-ACA on all subsequent pleadings. Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella no longer assigned to the case. (JLC) |
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella: Telephone Conference held on 3/13/2023. Pltf Lucinda Thomas appeared on her own behalf, due to a mix up, no one appeared for Dft. (JLC) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER; The Telephone Conference regarding consent to magistrate jurisdiction that is currently set for Monday, March 6, 2023 is RESET for Monday, March 13, 2023, at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Danella. The parties should dial (888) 363-4735 and enter access code 6785641 to participate in the conference. The parties are reminded that they are required to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by no later than March 30, 2023. The telephone conference will be cancelled by separate order if all parties have submitted their elections beforehand. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 2/27/2023. (JLC)
|
|
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER: Defendant has filed a "Motion To Dismiss." Doc. #7 . Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion is due on or before February 28, 2023. Defendant's reply, if any, is due on or before March 7, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 2/14/2023. (JLC)
|
| Set Deadlines as to #7 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due on or before February 28, 2023. Replies due on or before March 7, 2023. (JLC) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wal Mart, Inc.. filed by Wal Mart, Inc. (Nixon, Brooke) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER; Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) by no later than March 30, 2023. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a randomly drawn district judge without further order after March 30, 2023.A Telephone Status Conference is hereby SET for 1:30 PM on Monday, March 6, 2023. The parties are DIRECTED to call 888-363-4735 access code 6785641 five minutes prior to the start time of the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 2/13/2023. (JLC)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26 reminding the parties of their obligations under FRCP 26(f). Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/20/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 2/13/2023. (JLC)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Wal Mart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Nixon, Brooke) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lucinda Thomas. Wal Mart, Inc. served on 1/23/2023, answer due 2/13/2023. (JLC) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Wal Mart, Inc., delivered to the USM for service on this the 20th day of January, 2023. (JLC) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; DENYING #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 1/20/2023. (JLC)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF A CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR TRIAL. (JLC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Lucinda Thomas. (JLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wal Mart, Inc., filed by Lucinda Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(JLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas v. Wal Mart, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lucinda Thomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal Mart, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brooke M Nixon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
