Mukherjee et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Plaintiff: Rohit Mukherjee and Shuvra Mohinta
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Terri Robinson
Case Number: 2:2023cv00098
Filed: January 23, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Nicholas A Danella
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rohit Mukherjee, Shuvra Mohinta. Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 2/13/2023, answer due 4/14/2023; Terri Robinson served on 2/10/2023, answer due 4/11/2023; United States Citizenship and Immigration Service served on 2/13/2023, answer due 4/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit USPS Receipts)(Hacking, James)
February 1, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General, returned to Plaintiff for service via USPS on this the 1st day of February, 2023. (JLC)
January 24, 2023 Filing Fee received in the amount of $402.00, Credit Card receipt_number AALNDC-4255312, USDC/NDAL receipt #B3372. (Lilienthal, Morris) Modified on 1/24/2023 (JLC).
January 23, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF A CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR TRIAL. (JLC)
January 23, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, filed by Rohit Mukherjee, Shuvra Mohinta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mukherjee et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rohit Mukherjee
Represented By: James Oliver Hacking, III
Represented By: Morris Lilienthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shuvra Mohinta
Represented By: James Oliver Hacking, III
Represented By: Morris Lilienthal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terri Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?