Coke v. City of Birmingham, Alabama et al
| Markus Coke |
| City of Birmingham, Alabama, Birmingham Police Department and Zydeco |
| 2:2023cv00280 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
HAIKALA CHAMBERS INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 4/26/2023. (DNW)
|
| Filing 12 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum Brief in Support of Partial Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by City of Birmingham, Alabama. (Love, James) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT: Because the parties having not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge, the above-styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to Judge Madeline H. Haikala. Please use case number 2:23-cv-00280-MHH on all subsequent pleadings. Magistrate Judge Staci G. Cornelius no longer assigned to the case. (CTF) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Entry of Default against Zydeco Motion is RIPE 4/18/2023. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Markus Coke. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In Support of Request for Entry of Default) (CTF) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum Brief in Support of Partial Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by Markus Coke. (CTF) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER The parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than May 18, 2023. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign the case to a randomly drawn district judge without further order after May 18, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 04/05/2023. (CTF)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER regarding compliance with Rule 26; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/10/2023; Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 4/5/2023. (BST)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER re #5 MOTION to Dismiss. The plaintiff is ORDERED to file any opposition to the motion within fourteen (14) calendar days. The movants SHALL file any reply within seven (7) calendar days thereafter. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to provide a copy of this order to the plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 04/04/2023. (CTF)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum Brief in Support of Partial Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice by Birmingham Police Department, City of Birmingham, Alabama. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum Brief)(Love, James) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Markus Coke. Birmingham Police Department served on 3/13/2023, answer due 4/3/2023; City of Birmingham, Alabama served on 3/13/2023, answer due 4/3/2023; Zydeco served on 3/16/2023, answer due 4/6/2023. (CTF) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Birmingham Police Department, City of Birmingham, Alabama, Zydeco. Plaintiff to serve. (CTF) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of a case to a U. S. magistrate judge for trial. Sent to plaintiff via U. S. First Class Mail. (CTF) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Birmingham Police Department, City of Birmingham, Alabama, Zydeco, filed by Markus Coke. (CTF) |
| Filing fee: $ 402.00 cash, receipt number B-4111. (CTF) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
