Mayfield et al v. Mygrant Glass Company Inc
Darrin Mayfield, Cedric Moore and Emanuel Hawkins |
Mygrant Glass Company Inc |
2:2023cv00435 |
April 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Gray M Borden |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Darrin Mayfield, Cedric Moore, Emanuel Hawkins. Mygrant Glass Company Inc waiver sent on 4/27/2023, answer due 6/26/2023. (Wilkinson, Cynthia) |
Filing 3 TEXT ORDER: The docket sheet does not reflect payment of the filing fee or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Plaintiff is ORDERED to either pay the fee or file a motion for IFP on or before 04/14/2023 or the complaint will be subject to dismissal without further order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden on 04/07/2023. (SUH) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4314485. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Mygrant Glass Company Inc, filed by Darrin Mayfield, Cedric Moore, Emanuel Hawkins.(KAM). (Wilkinson, Cynthia) NDAL rec# B-4668 Modified on 4/10/2023 (KAM). |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Emanuel Hawkins, Darrin Mayfield, Cedric Moore. (KAM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mygrant Glass Company Inc, filed by Darrin Mayfield, Cedric Moore, Emanuel Hawkins.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.