Anderson v. Whitfield, et al
| Lawrence Anderson |
| Lt. Whitfield, Bryan Moore, Kenneth Noe and Atkins |
| 2:2023cv00447 |
| April 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Gray M Borden |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Lawrence Anderson. (address updated on 5/18/2023) (KSS) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to the Court of his Intentions to Continue these Litigations by Lawrence Anderson. (KSS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address and other request by Lawrence Anderson. (KSS) |
Filing 4
ORDER It is ORDERED that the #2 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED, plaintiff is required to pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $9.47, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 4/13/2023. (KSS)
|
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re: case number. (mailed to plaintiff by USPS this day) (KSS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lawrence Anderson. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Atkins, Bryan Moore, Kenneth Noe, Whitfield, filed by Lawrence Anderson.(KAM) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/12/2023: #1 complaint) (KAM, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
