Johnson v. Bailey et al
| Deandrew Rolonzo Johnson, II |
| David Lance Bailey, Todd Hall, Andy Hamlin, Keith Cox, Samuel W Junkin, Richard Black, William Rob Finny and Dana Elmore |
| 2:2023cv00478 |
| April 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| John H England |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
FINAL ORDER The court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)(iii) and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order. See Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 837 (11th Cir. 1989) (a plaintiff's status as an unrepresented litigant does not absolve him of the requirement to comply with all court orders and rules). Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 5/16/2023. (KSS)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER On May 12, 2023, the court received two sets of documents from pro se Plaintiff as set out. Because Mr. Johnson marked the documents "private," "confidential," and "not for release," the Clerk will not file the documents on the docket. The Clerk will maintain the documents in the paper file. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 5/16/2023. (KSS)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT-The above-styled civil action has been reassigned to the Honorable Annemarie Carney Axon. Please use case number 2:23 CV 478 ACA on all subsequent pleadings. (AKD) |
|
Filing 6
REASSIGNMENT ORDER- Due to the nature of this action and case-specific circumstances, the undersigned has determined he will not be able to obtain consent in this action in a timely manner. Therefore, consistent with the General Order for Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign the case to a District Judge for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 05/04/2023. (AKD)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against David Lance Bailey, Richard Black, Keith Cox, Dana Elmore, William Rob Finny, Todd Hall, Andy Hamlin, Samuel W Junkin, filed by Deandrew Rolonzo Johnson, II.(AKD) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Mr. Johnson may commence this action without prepayment of fees or costs or the giving of security. For reasons set out herein, the plaintiff is ORDERED to file an amended complaint bearing this case number (2:23-cv-00478-JHE) on the first page within twenty-one (21) days from the entry date of this order. Service of process will not begin until an amended complaint complying with this order is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 04/17/2023. (AKD)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CONSENT to a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AKD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 4/12/2023. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Deandrew Rolonzo Johnson, II. (AKD) Modified on 4/13/2023 (Recieved for Review by Magistrate Judge on March 24, 2023) (AKD). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Lance Bailey, Richard Black, Keith "Booty&quo Cox, Dana Elmore, William Rob Finny, Todd Hall, Andy Hamlin, Samuel W Junkin, filed by Deandrew Rolonzo Johnson, II.(AKD) (Recieved for Review on March 24, 2023 by Magistrate Judge) Modified on 4/13/2023 (AKD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
