Smith v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
| Matthew Gunnar Smith |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Sean Kennedy, Chad Parker and Brian S. Allen |
| 2:2023cv00567 |
| May 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Nicholas A Danella |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 49 U.S.C. ยง 20109 - Federal Railroad Safety Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing Fee received in the amount of $402.00, Credit Card receipt_number AALNDC-4341928, NDAL receipt #B5310.(Tucker, William) Modified on 5/15/2023 (JLC). |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Matthew Gunnar Smith. (Tucker, William) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Matthew Gunnar Smith. (Tucker, William) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Matthew Gunnar Smith. (Tucker, William) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Matthew Gunnar Smith. (Tucker, William) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Matthew Gunnar Smith. (Tucker, William) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF A CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR TRIAL. (JLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brian S. Allen, Sean Kennedy, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Chad Parker, filed by Matthew Gunnar Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
