Swint v. National Security Agency et al
| Robert James Swint |
| National Security Agency and National Stroke Association |
| 2:2023cv00572 |
| May 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER As a result as set out, reopening the case is futile because the court would then immediately dismiss it with prejudice as frivolous. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 6/15/2023. (KSS)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION (Affidavit) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert James Swint. (KSS) |
|
Filing 3
FINAL ORDER Mr. Swint has not paid the filing fee or filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, the court DISMISSES this action for his lack of prosecution and failure to comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 5/23/2023. (KSS)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER - On or before May 22, 2023, Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff does not comply with this order, the court may dismiss this case for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 5/8/23. (Attachments: #1 IFP Form)(SAC)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Security Agency, National Stroke Association, filed by Robert James Swint. (KSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
