Pittman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
| Randy D Pittman |
| Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice |
| 2:2023cv00896 |
| July 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| Corey L Maze |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
FINAL ORDER Consistent with the accompanying memorandum opinion, the court DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 8/1/2023. (SRD)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Corey L. Maze on 8/1/2023. (SRD)
|
|
Filing 4
OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by Randy D Pittman. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION For the reasons stated within, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the court DENY the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2]) and DISMISS all claims in this action without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Objections to R&R due by 8/1/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 7/18/2023. (SRD)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Randy D Pittman. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Justice, filed by Randy D Pittman.(KAM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
