Woodruff v. Ragazzoni et al
John Woodruff |
Luigi Ragazzoni, David Pressley and John Samaniego |
2:2023cv01155 |
August 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Nicholas A Danella |
Corey L Maze |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: The Court having received prisoner consent form, the Warden is directed to deduct Monthly Payments from Prison Account of John Woodruff; Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this order on Woodruff; Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this order and a copy of the signed Prisoner Consent Form #4 to the warden or chief jailer of Woodruff's housing facility and the Department Fiscal Manager for ADOC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 10/6/2023. (LCB) |
Filing 4 PRISONER CONSENT FORM by John Woodruff (LCB) |
Initial Partial Filing fee: $41.67 receipt number B-7729 (LCB) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A. Danella on 9/18/2023. (SRD) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Woodruff. (KAM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Pressley, Luigi Ragazzoni, John Samaniego, filed by John Woodruff.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.