Hatcher v. Battle & Winn LLP
Plaintiff: Sylvester Hatcher
Defendant: Battle & Winn LLP
Case Number: 2:2023cv01226
Filed: September 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Annemarie Carney Axon
Referring Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL Title 18 U.S.C. 873 does not authorize a private cause of action. Reaves, 2021 WL 4728779, at *3. Therefore, the Complaint is due to be dismissed, and the court further concludes that any amendment by Hatcher would be futile. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Accordingly, Hatcher's claim against Adam Plant and Battle & Winn, LLC under 18 U.S.C. 873 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/4/2023. (KAM)
October 3, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT- Because the parties have not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable R. David Proctor. Please use case number 2:23 CV 1226 RDP on all subsequent pleadings. Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius no longer assigned to the case. (AKD)
September 28, 2023 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius. Judge Annemarie Carney Axon no longer assigned to the case. (RMM)
September 27, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of filing by Sylvester Hatcher (RMM)
September 26, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT (RMM)
September 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER This case appears to be related to Hatcher v. Davison Design & Development, Inc., Case No. 2:23-cv-201-SGC. (See doc. 2). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to reassign this case to Magistrate Judge Staci Cornelius. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 09/26/2023. (RMM)
September 18, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Battle & Winn LLP. (Plant, Adam)
September 18, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE by Battle & Winn LLP NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) (Plant, Adam)
September 18, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Battle & Winn LLP RULE 7.1 CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (Plant, Adam)
September 18, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE by Battle & Winn LLP NOTICE OF RELATED CASE (Plant, Adam)
September 18, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Battle & Winn LLP from Jefferson County Circuit Court, case number 01-CV-2023-3113, filed by Battle & Winn LLP.(Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(RMM)
September 18, 2023 Filing fee: $402, receipt number B-7459, CM/ECF Credit Card Payment AALNDC-4429391. (RMM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hatcher v. Battle & Winn LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sylvester Hatcher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Battle & Winn LLP
Represented By: Adam P Plant
Represented By: Robert E Battle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?