Payne v. Security Engineers Inc
| LaTonya Payne |
| Security Engineers Inc, Daniel Tillman and Sade Reed |
| 2:2023cv01348 |
| October 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Nicholas A Danella |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee: $ 402.00, ALND receipt number B-8253 (SRD) |
Filing 5
ORDER Plaintiff's complaint shows no such exceptional circumstances, so Payne is not entitled to appointment of an attorney at this time, and her motion is DENIED. Payne's motion for leave to proceed in formapauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED. Payne must pay the filing fee to the court on orbefore November 3, 2023. If she does not do so, the court may dismiss this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 10/13/2023. (KAM)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR TRIAL (KAM) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of filing Right to Sue letter by LaTonya Payne (KAM) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LaTonya Payne. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Security Engineers Inc, filed by LaTonya Payne.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
