Hibbett Retail Inc v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
Plaintiff: Hibbett Retail Inc
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Beazley USA Services Inc
Case Number: 2:2023cv01411
Filed: October 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Gray M Borden
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Before the court is Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice. Doc. 11. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without court order by filing a notice of dismissal before an opposing party answers the complaint or files a motion for summary judgment. Because the defendant has not responded to Plaintiff's complaint, the notice of voluntary dismissal is appropriate. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this file pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) (A)(i). Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 12/4/2023. (RMM)
December 1, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hibbett Retail Inc (Hellums, Christopher)
November 27, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Nicholson Terenzi on behalf of Beazley USA Services Inc, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London (Terenzi, Elizabeth)
November 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 TEXT ORDER re #6 Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a response to the motion on or before 12/1/2023, and Defendants may file a reply on or before 12/8/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden on 11/17/2023. (CMD)
November 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Pursuant to the General Order for Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than January 3, 2024. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign the case to a randomly drawn district judge without further order after January 3, 2024. A telephone conference is SET for 10:00 a.m. on December 20, 2023. The parties are DIRECTED to dial 205-931-0422 no less than five minutes before the status conference begins. The phone conference ID is 115 763 14. The telephone conference will be cancelled by separate order if all parties submit forms 24 hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 11/17/2023. (RMM)
November 16, 2023 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Beazley USA Services Inc, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London. filed by Beazley USA Services Inc, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London (Smith, Alfred)
November 16, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Beazley USA Services Inc, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Vianny Pichardo)(Smith, Alfred)
November 6, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hibbett Retail Inc. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London served on 11/6/2023, answer due 11/27/2023. (RMM)
October 30, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hibbett Retail Inc. Beazley USA Services Inc served on 10/26/2023, answer due 11/16/2023. (RMM)
October 24, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London via certified mail. (RMM)
October 23, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Beazley USA Services Inc via certified mail. (RMM)
October 18, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Beazley USA Services Inc, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, filed by Hibbett Retail Inc.(Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(RMM)
October 18, 2023 Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4450939/ALND receipt B-7984. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Beazley USA Services Inc, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, filed by Hibbett Retail Inc.(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(RMM). (Hellums, Christopher)Modified on 10/18/2023 (RMM).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hibbett Retail Inc v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hibbett Retail Inc
Represented By: Jonathan S Mann
Represented By: Christopher T Hellums
Represented By: Austin Brock Whitten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Represented By: Elizabeth Nicholson Terenzi
Represented By: Alfred F Smith, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beazley USA Services Inc
Represented By: Alfred F Smith, Jr
Represented By: Elizabeth Nicholson Terenzi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?