Williams v. Birmingham, City of et al
Daryl Williams |
Birmingham, City of and Birmingham Water Works and Sewer Board |
2:2023cv01416 |
October 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Gray M Borden |
Condemnation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Birmingham Water Works and Sewer Board.(Parnell, K) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daryl Williams. Birmingham Water Works and Sewer Board served on 11/1/2023, answer due 11/22/2023. (RMM) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daryl Williams. Birmingham, City of served on 11/1/2023, answer due 11/22/2023. (RMM) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Birmingham Water Works and Sewer Board, Birmingham, City of, via certified mail. (RMM) |
Filing fee received: $ 402, ALND receipt number B-8189 (RMM) |
Filing 2 TEXT ORDER: The docket sheet does not reflect payment of the filing fee or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Plaintiff is ORDERED to either pay the fee or file a motion for IFP on or before 11/1/2023 or the complaint will be subject to dismissal without further order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden on 10/25/2023. (SUH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Birmingham Water Works and Sewer Board, Birmingham, City of, filed by Daryl Williams.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.