Penn National Security Insurance Company v. Dry Southeast LLC et al
Penn National Security Insurance Company |
Dry Southeast LLC, Todd Workman and Sandra Atchison |
2:2023cv01573 |
November 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Nicholas A Danella |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MINUTE ENTRY OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Plaintiff Penn National Security Insurance Company has voluntarily dismissed this action WITH PREJUDICE. Doc. #3 . This case is CLOSED. Signed on 1/8/2024. (SRD) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Penn National Security Insurance Company (Neeley, Graham) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 405, receipt_number AALNDC-4489372. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Sandra Atchison, Dry Southeast LLC, Todd Workman, filed by Penn National Security Insurance Company. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(KAM). (Neeley, Graham) Modified on 12/18/2023. NDAL rec# B-9093 (KAM). |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF CASE TO A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR TRIAL (SRD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sandra Atchison, Dry Southeast LLC, Todd Workman, filed by Penn National Security Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.