Thomas v. United States of America
Petitioner: Camerin Neshun Thomas
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2023cv08036
Filed: October 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER This matter is before the court on the Government's Motion for Extension of Time (45 Days) to File a Response to Petitioner's 2255 Motion. (Doc. # 6). The Motion (Doc. # 6) is GRANTED. The Government SHALL file a response to Petitioner's 2255 Motion on or before Monday, February 5, 2024. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/21/2023. (KAM)
December 20, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Order on Motion for Extension of Time,, Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, by United States of America. (Kirk, Alan)
November 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER This matter is before the court on the Governments Motion for Extension of Time (30 Days) to File a Response to Petitioners 2255 Motion. (Doc. # 4). The Motion (Doc. # 4) is GRANTED. The Government SHALL file a response to Petitioner's 2255 Motion on or before Friday, December 22, 2023. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 11/20/2023. (KAM)
November 19, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time , MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) by United States of America. (Kirk, Alan)
November 1, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Alan S Kirk on behalf of United States of America (Kirk, Alan)
November 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER Camerin Neshun Thomas ("Petitioner") has filed with the Clerk of this Court a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. (Doc. # 1). Petitioner seeks to vacate the sentence imposed upon him on February 23, 2023 in criminal case number 1:22-cr-00261-RDP-GMB-1. The United States is DIRECTED to appear and SHOW CAUSE in writing, within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order, why the relief requested by Petitioner should not be granted. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Order upon Petitioner and to serve a copy of this Order, together with a copy of Petitioner's 2255 motion, upon the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 11/1/2023. (RMM)
October 30, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Camerin Neshun Thomas.(KAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Camerin Neshun Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Prim F. Escalona, US Attorney
Represented By: Allison Garnett
Represented By: M Blake Milner
Represented By: Alan S Kirk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?