Watson v. Weigh to Wellness LLC
Plaintiff: Brittany Watson
Defendant: Weigh to Wellness LLC
Case Number: 2:2024cv00127
Filed: February 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER-Pursuant to the General Order for Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than April 29, 2024. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign the case to a randomly drawn district judge without further order after April 29, 2024.A telephone status conference is SET for 11:15 a.m. on April 8, 2024. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-336-1831 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 2778178. The parties should call in five minutes prior to the start time of the conference. The telephone conference will be cancelled by separate order if forms from all parties are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 03/13/2024. (AKD)
March 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER regarding compliance with Rule 26; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/17/2024; Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 3/13/2024. (BST, )
March 13, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret Ames Filippini on behalf of Weigh to Wellness LLC (Filippini, Margaret)
March 13, 2024 Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Weigh to Wellness LLC. filed by Weigh to Wellness LLC (Kauffman, Douglas)
March 13, 2024 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Weigh to Wellness LLC.(Kauffman, Douglas)
February 26, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brittany Watson. Weigh to Wellness LLC served on 2/22/2024, answer due 3/14/2024. (Calamusa, Rocco)
February 21, 2024 Filing 5 Alias Summons Issued as to Weigh to Wellness LLC. Returned to plantiff for service. (AKD)
February 21, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Returned Unexecuted by Brittany Watson as to Weigh to Wellness LLC. (Calamusa, Rocco)
February 6, 2024 Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number B-9891 (AKD)
February 5, 2024 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Weigh to Wellness LLC. Returned to plaintiff for service. (AKD)
February 5, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE OF CONSENT to a magistrate judge in a civil action. (AKD)
February 2, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Weigh to Wellness LLC, filed by Brittany Watson.(AKD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watson v. Weigh to Wellness LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Watson
Represented By: Rocco Calamusa, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Weigh to Wellness LLC
Represented By: Douglas B Kauffman
Represented By: Margaret Ames Filippini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?