East v. Alabama State Board of Pharmacy et al
| Billy Flint East |
| Alabama State Board of Pharmacy, Donna Conyers Yeatman, James S Ward, James F Hampton, Jennifer Muro Neumann, Chris Phung, Robert Colburn, Christy Garmon, Thomas Cobb, Gary Mount, J Scott Daniel, Mark Delk and Estate of Edward R Braden |
| 2:2024cv00369 |
| March 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 405, receipt_number AALNDC-4556546. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Alabama State Board of Pharmacy, Thomas Cobb, Robert Colburn, J Scott Daniel, Mark Delk, Estate of Edward R Braden, Christy Garmon, James F Hampton, Gary Mount, Jennifer Muro Neumann, Chris Phung, James S Ward, Donna Conyers Yeatman, filed by Billy Flint East.(Attachments: # 1 Exhibits A-U, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS). (Hooten, Caroline) Modified on 3/25/2024 - Receipt No. B-10700 (ASL). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alabama State Board of Pharmacy, Thomas Cobb, Robert Colburn, J Scott Daniel, Mark Delk, Estate of Edward R Braden, Christy Garmon, James F Hampton, Gary Mount, Jennifer Muro Neumann, Chris Phung, James S Ward, Donna Conyers Yeatman, filed by Billy Flint East.(Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-U, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(KNS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
