Cadence Bank v. B&H Brands LLC et al
| Cadence Bank |
| B&H Brands LLC doing business as JDog Junk Removal & Hauling and James McClure |
| 2:2024cv00374 |
| March 25, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Nicholas A Danella |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to B&H Brands LLC. (KAM) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Entry of Default by Cadence Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Clark, Nolan) |
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER: Defendant B&H Brands LLC was served and its answer was due April 23, 2024. (See doc. #10 ). It has not answered the complaint. Accordingly, the court ORDERS Plaintiff Cadence Bank to SHOW CAUSE on or before May 22, 2024, why Defendant B&H Brands LLC should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 5/15/2024. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER: Defendant James McClure filed a suggestion of bankruptcy. (Doc. #7 ). Without objection from Plaintiff Cadence Bank (doc. 11), the court STAYS all proceedings against Mr. McClure pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 362. The case will proceed against Defendant B&H Brands LLC. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 5/15/2024. (KAM)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Cadence Bank. (Clark, Nolan) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed B&H Brands LLC served on 4/2/2024, answer due 4/23/2024. (CLD) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: Defendant James McClure has filed a suggestion of bankruptcy. (Doc. 7). The court ORDERS Plaintiff Cadence Bank to SHOW CAUSE on or before May 15, 2024, why the court should not stay proceedings against Mr. McClure under 11 U.S.C. 362(a)(1). Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 5/1/2024. (KAM)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed James McClure served on 4/2/2024, answer due 4/23/2024. (CLD) |
| Filing 7 SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record by James McClure. filed by James McClure (Altmann, Steven) |
|
Filing 6
INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Annemarie Carney Axon on 4/2/24. (SAC)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to B&H Brands LLC, James McClure, mailed certified mail to dfts. (BST, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT The above-styled civil action has been reassigned to the Honorable Annemarie Carney Axon. Please use case number 2:24-cv-374-ACA on all subsequent pleadings. (SRD) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL The undersigned hereby recuses himself from further participation in this case. Accordingly, the court DIRECTS the Clerk to reassign this case to another judge in accordance with the Clerk's normal procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 3/27/2024. (SRD)
|
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Cadence Bank. (Clark, Nolan) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 405, receipt_number AALNDC-4558019. related document #1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Cadence Bank. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(SRD). (Clark, Nolan) ALND Rcpt. No: B-10723 on 3/27/2024 (SRD). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Cadence Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(SRD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
