Sipin v. PNC Bank NA et al
| Gideon J Sipin |
| PNC Bank NA, Federal National Mortgage Association, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and Sirote & Permutt PC |
| 2:2026cv01321 |
| July 28, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Negotiable Instrumen |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by PNC Bank NA, Sirote & Permutt PC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Federal National Mortgage Association from the Circuit Court of Shelby County, Alabama, case number 58-CV-2026-900734.00., filed by PNC Bank NA, Sirote & Permutt PC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Federal National Mortgage Association. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(CLG) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 405, receipt_number AALNDC-5211672. related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by PNC Bank NA, Sirote & Permutt PC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Federal National Mortgage Association from the Circuit Court of Shelby County, Alabama, case number 58-CV-2026-900734.00., filed by PNC Bank NA, Sirote & Permutt PC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc, Federal National Mortgage Association. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)(CLG). (Patterson, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
