Nunnari v. Mitchell

Plaintiff: Joseph Anthony Nunnari
Defendant: Madeline Grace Mitchell
Case Number: 3:2010cv01367
Filed: May 28, 2010
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northwestern Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Harwell G Davis
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 8, 2012 35 Opinion or Order of the Court FINAL JUDGMENT in accordance with memorandum opinion, dft's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to all claims asserted by pla in this action; this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own costs; ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Inge P Johnson for all further proceedings. Magistrate-Judge Harwell G Davis, III no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Inge P Johnson on 5/8/12. (ASL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nunnari v. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Anthony Nunnari
Represented By: James F McKenzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Madeline Grace Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?