Roddy et al v. City of Sheffield, Alabama et al
William M. Roddy and Wendy Sue Roddy |
City of Sheffield, Alabama, City of Huntsville, Alabama, Brett McCulley, Terry Lucas, DeWayne McCarver, Clarence M. Thornberry, Anthony E. McElyea and Jason M. Ramsey |
3:2011cv04355 |
December 29, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Northwestern Office |
Colbert |
C Lynwood Smith |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 120 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE that the motions for summary judgment are GRANTED; Defendants' motion to supplement their evidentiary submissions in support of summary judgment, and plaintiffs' motion to strike the affidavit of Madison County Assistant District Attorney James Tolleson, are DENIED as moot; Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED with prejudice; Costs are taxed to plaintiffs as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 5/23/2013. (AHI) Modified on 5/24/2013 (AHI). |
Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the state-law claims against defendant EddieMcDaniel are DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the federal-law claims against him are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with federal pleading standards, as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 11/5/2012. (AHI) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.