Savage v. RCHP-Florence, LLC

Plaintiff: Teresa Savage
Defendant: RCHP-Florence, LLC
Case Number: 3:2012cv00009
Filed: January 3, 2012
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Northwestern Office
County: Colbert
Presiding Judge: C Lynwood Smith
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 20, 2013 26 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the motion to strike is GRANTED and it is ORDERED that all references to statements by plaintiff's co-worker "Teresa" shall be striken from the record and Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 6/20/2013. (AHI )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Savage v. RCHP-Florence, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa Savage
Represented By: Adam M Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RCHP-Florence, LLC
Represented By: Waverly D Crenshaw
Represented By: Stanley E Graham
Represented By: John J Park
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?