EMCASCO Insurance Company v. Knight et al
| EMCASCO Insurance Company |
| Kelli Knight and Christopher Knight |
| Kelli Knight and Christopher Knight |
| EMCASCO Insurance Company |
| 3:2012cv01890 |
| May 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Northwestern Office |
| Colbert |
| C Lynwood Smith |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERS that it is ORDERED that the Memorandum Opinion and ORder filed on 8/22/2014 is rescinded and withdrawn; it is ORDERED that EMCASCO's motion for summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as more fully set; it is further ordered that Christopher and Kelli Knight may not claim damages for the value of firearms and jewelry acquired by them prior to their 2008 bankruptcy proceedings as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 10/7/2014. (AHI )
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the 20 MOTION for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; it is ORDERED that the Knights are estopped from asserting claims based upon the value of firearms and jewelry purchased before the 2008 bankruptcy proceeding as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 8/22/2014. (AHI )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
