Groce v. Franklin County Commission et al
Plaintiff: Evelyn Groce
Defendant: Franklin County Commission, Franklin County Revenue Commission and Gene Ellision
Case Number: 3:2013cv01769
Filed: September 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Northwestern Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Harwell G Davis
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 3/23/2017. (KEK)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 PARTIAL DISMISSAL ORDER,as set out, ADOPTING and ACCEPTING the magistrate judge's report and recommendation 13 . As to dfts' motion to dismiss 7 , it is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: (1) dfts' motion to dismiss pla 's Title VII claim for wrongful termination based on her race is DENIED; (2) dfts' motion to dismiss pla's Title VII claim for failure to promote based on her race is GRANTED, and such claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; (3) dfts' motion to dismiss pla's Title VII claim for raciallyhostile environment and Title VII claim against dft Gene Ellison in his individual capacity is MOOT; (4) dfts' motion to dismiss pla's claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1981 is GRAN TED, and such claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;(5) dfts' motion to dismiss pla's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims for disparate treatment is DENIED; (6) dfts' motion to dismiss pla's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for racially hosti le environment is MOOT; (7) dfts' motion to dismiss pla's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against dft Gene Ellison based on qualified immunity is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to reasserting a qualified immunity claim on summary judgment; (8) dfts ' motion to dismiss pla's Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim against the Franklin County Commission and Franklin County Revenue Commission is DENIED; and (9) dfts' motion to dismiss pla's Age Discrimination in Employment Act claim against dft Gene Ellison in his individual capacity is MOOT. Motion terminated 7 . Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 7/16/14. (CTS, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Groce v. Franklin County Commission et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evelyn Groce
Represented By: Roderick T Cooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Franklin County Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Franklin County Revenue Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gene Ellision
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?