Gentry v. Russellville, Alabama, City of
Defendant: Russellville, Alabama, City of
Petitioner: Chelsea Gentry
Case Number: 3:2016cv01466
Filed: September 6, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Northwestern Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: Madeline Hughes Haikala
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that the defendant's motion for summary judgment in each case is GRANTED as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 8/29/2019. Associated Cases: 3:16-cv-01466-LCB, 3:17-cv-01127-LCB(AHI)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gentry v. Russellville, Alabama, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Chelsea Gentry
Represented By: Mary-Ellen Bates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Russellville, Alabama, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?