Fulmer v. PCH Hotels and Resorts Inc
Plaintiff: Steven Lee Fulmer
Defendant: PCH Hotels and Resorts Inc
Case Number: 3:2017cv00938
Filed: June 6, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Northwestern Office
County: Lauderdale
Presiding Judge: Madeline Hughes Haikala
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons stated, the Court denies PCH's motion for summary judgment on Mr. Fulmer's age discrimination and retaliation claims. The Court grants PCH's motion for summary judgment on Mr. Fulmer's state law claims. The Court will enter a separate order setting this matter for trial. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 4/20/2020. (KEK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fulmer v. PCH Hotels and Resorts Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Lee Fulmer
Represented By: Sonya C Edwards
Represented By: Alicia Kay Haynes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PCH Hotels and Resorts Inc
Represented By: Tiffany Parrish Rainbolt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?