McIntyre v. Singleton et al
| Jerrod Nicholas McIntyre |
| Jason Butler, Charles Woods, Vicki White and Rick Singleton |
| 3:2018cv01671 |
| October 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Liles C Burke |
| John H England |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE that this action is DIMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 12/6/2018. (AHI )
|
| Filing 4 Case Reassigned to Judge Liles C Burke. Judge R David Proctor no longer assigned to the case. (KAM) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee of $27.20, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days, Motions terminated: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jerrod Nicholas McIntyre.. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 10/25/2018. (KAM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jerrod Nicholas McIntyre. (KAM, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jason Butler, Rick Singleton, Vicki White, Charles Woods, filed by Jerrod Nicholas McIntyre.(KAM, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
