Appling v. Diversified Consultants Inc
| Timothy Appling |
| Diversified Consultants Inc |
| 3:2018cv01952 |
| November 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER STAYING CASE: Based on the Notice of Settlement filed by Plaintiff (Doc. 9), the Court STAYS all current deadlines. Plaintiff shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal by February 28, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 1/8/19. (BJL)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Timothy Appling of Settlement (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Diversified Consultants Inc served on 12/13/2018, answer due 1/3/2019. (BJL) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Diversified Consultants Inc by Clerk for service via certified mail. (BJL) |
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of David J. Philipps and Mary E. Philipps. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 11/28/18. (LBG, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald C Sykstus on behalf of Timothy Appling (Sykstus, Ronald) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial. (BJL) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 50, receipt number 1126-3225709 (receipt number B4601093716). (Philipps, David) Modified on 11/29/2018 (BJL). |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 50, receipt number 1126-3225711 (receipt number B4601093717). (Philipps, David) Modified on 11/29/2018 (BJL). |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3225704 (receipt number B4601093715). related document #1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Diversified Consultants Inc filed by Timothy Appling. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(BJL). (Philipps, David) Modified on 11/29/2018 (BJL). |
| Filing 3 Request for service by certified mail filed by Timothy Appling. (BJL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by David J. Philipps and Mary E. Philipps. Motion is RIPE 11/27/2018. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Timothy Appling. (BJL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Diversified Consultants Inc filed by Timothy Appling. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(BJL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Appling v. Diversified Consultants Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Diversified Consultants Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Timothy Appling | |
| Represented By: | Ronald C Sykstus |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
