Whitson v. Coker et al
| Kenneth Wayne Whitson |
| Bryce Graham, Jr, Chad D Coker and Harold V Hughston, Jr |
| 3:2018cv01972 |
| November 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| John E Ott |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER that the court having received prisoner consent form the Warden is directed to deduct Monthly Payments from Prison Account of KENNETH WAYNE WHITSON. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 1/10/2019. (PSM)
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner consent form by Kenneth Wayne Whitson (TLM, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 1.00, receipt number H4601003842 (TLM, ) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to re #4 filed by Kenneth Wayne Whitson. (TLM, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER terming motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 12/4/2018. (PSM)
|
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT by Kenneth Wayne Whitson. (TLM, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kenneth Wayne Whitson. (TLM, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chad D Coker, Bryce Graham, Jr, Harold V Hughston, Jr, filed by Kenneth Wayne Whitson.(TLM, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
