Byrd v. Ford Motor Company
| Richard S. Byrd |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 3:2019cv00398 |
| March 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| C Lynwood Smith |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 NOTICE from the Clerk of Court to the parties filed by The Clerk. (JLC) |
Filing 30
ORDER DISMISSING CASE that the mediator having notified the court that all claims embraced herein have been resolved by settlement, it is, accordingly, ORDERED that all claims be DISMISSED with prejudice, but upon this condition: if plaintiff or defendants fail to fulfill in all respects the terms of the parties' negotiated settlement agreements within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 45 days from this date, then the dissatisfied party or parties may petition the court to reinstate this action, and such reinstatement shall relate back to the original date of filing; costs are taxed as paid. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 2/28/2020. (AHI, )
|
| Filing 29 STATUS REPORT Amended Report of Mediator by Brad Wash. filed by Brad Wash (Wash, R) |
| Filing 28 STATUS REPORT Report of Mediator Mediation was unsuccessful by Brad Wash. filed by Brad Wash (Wash, R) Modified on 2/27/2020 (AHI). |
|
Filing 27
ORDER that the #26 Motion to Stay is GRANTED and it is ORDERED that all remaining deadlines are STAYED pending a ruling in this matter by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 12/17/2019. (AHI )
|
| Filing 26 MOTION to Stay by Richard S. Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit One, #2 Exhibit Two, #3 Exhibit Three)(Underwood, Earl) |
|
Filing 25
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER that certain documents and information shall remain confidential as set out in this order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 10/23/2019. (AHI )
|
| Filing 24 MOTION for Protective Order by Ford Motor Company. (Parker, Rudolph) |
| Filing 23 ANSWER to #22 Amended Complaint by Ford Motor Company.(Parker, Rudolph) |
| Filing 22 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT with jury demand thereon against Ford Motor Company filed by Richard S. Byrd.(AHI ) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER that the #16 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DNEID without prejudice and the #19 Motion to File an Amended Complaint is GRANTED as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 9/6/2019. (AHI)
|
| Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition re #16 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Richard S. Byrd. (Underwood, Earl) |
| Filing 19 First MOTION to Amend/Correct #18 Order by Richard S. Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit One, #3 Exhibit Two, #4 Exhibit Three, #5 Exhibit Four, #6 Exhibit Five)(Underwood, Earl) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER that plaintiff is to respond to defendant's #16 motion for judgment on pleadings by 9/4/2019. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 8/20/2019. (AHI)
|
| Filing 17 Brief re #16 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Parker, Rudolph) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by Ford Motor Company. (Parker, Rudolph) |
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: that certain time limits and deadlines apply as set out in this order; Discovery due by 6/22/2020; Dispositive Motions due by 7/22/2020; Witness and Exhibit Lists due by 8/24/2020; Trial ready by 9/2020. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 7/19/2019. (AHI)
|
| Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Parker, Rudolph) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER that the #12 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED and the parties are ORDERED to conduct the Rule 26 planning meeting by 7/5/2019 and to file the report within 14 days after the meeting. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 6/21/2019. (AHI)
|
| Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time by Ford Motor Company. (Cannon, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER that the #5 Motion to Remand to State Court is DENIED. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 5/24/2019. (AHI)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr: Motion Hearing held on 5/24/2019 re #5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Richard S. Byrd; Earl Underwood present on behalf of pla; Jeffrey Cannon, Jr present on behalf of dft. (Court Reporter Christina Decker.) (SPT ) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER that this case is set for oral argument on plaintiff's motion to remand at 10:00 a.m. on Friday, May 24, 2019, in the United States Courthouse at 101 Holmes Avenue NE, Huntsville, Alabama. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 05/03/19. (SPT )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER that the #8 Joint Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED and the parties are ORDERED to conduct the Rule 26 planning meeting within 14 days after this court rules on the motion to remand and to file the report of that planning meeting within 14 days after the meeting. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 4/23/2019. (AHI)
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time by Ford Motor Company. (Cannon, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Ford Motor Company. (Parker, Rudolph) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER that defendant is to respond to the #5 MOTION to Remand by 3/27/2019. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 3/13/2019. (AHI)
|
| Filing 5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court by Richard S. Byrd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit One, #2 Exhibit Two, #3 Exhibit Three)(Underwood, Earl) |
|
Filing 4
ALND UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURHTER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 3/7/2019. (AHI)
|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Ford Motor Company. filed by Ford Motor Company (Parker, Rudolph) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Ford Motor Company.(Parker, Rudolph) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ford Motor Company from Circuit Court of Lauderdale County, Alabama, case number 41-CV-2019-900037, filed by Ford Motor Company with jury demand contained within the body of the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(AHI ) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3294513 (B4601095901). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ford Motor Company from Circuit Court of Lauderdale County, Alabama, case number 41-CV-2019-900037, filed by Ford Motor Company with jury demand contained within the body of the complaint. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(AHI ). (Parker, Rudolph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Byrd v. Ford Motor Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Bartow Cannon, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Rudolph Woods Parker, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard S. Byrd | |
| Represented By: | Earl P Underwood, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
