Dudley v. Singleton et al
| Laurie Dudley |
| Steven Carlton, Rick Singleton and David Dison |
| 3:2020cv00626 |
| May 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Laurie Dudley, Steven Carlton, Rick Singleton, and David Dison. (BJL) |
Filing 19
ORDER: the court DENIES the Motions to Dismiss at MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 7/1/20. (BJL)
|
| Filing 18 REPLY to re #17 , #16 filed by Steven Carlton, David Dison, Rick Singleton. (McNeill, J) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Laurie Dudley. (Fonteneau, Kira) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Laurie Dudley. (Fonteneau, Kira) |
| Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Laurie Dudley.(Fonteneau, Kira) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: The Court CANCELS the telephone status conference previously scheduled for Thursday, July 23, 2020, and RESETS it for 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, July 8, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 6/23/20. (BJL)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER: the parties are hereby notified that, unless they unanimously consent to the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge by no later than July 23, 2020, the case will be reassigned to a randomly-drawn district judge for all purposes. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 6/9/20. (BJL)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER: The Court SETS a telephone status conference for 9:30 a.m. on Thursday, July 23, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 6/9/20. (BJL) Modified on 6/23/2020 (BJL). Modified on 7/2/2020 (BJL).
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER: The court ORDERS Plaintiff to separately respond to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss within 14 days of the date of this order. Defendants must file replies within 7 days of Plaintiff's responses. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 6/9/20. (BJL)
|
| Filing 10 Brief re #9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Steven Carlton, David Dison. (McNeill, J) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Steven Carlton, David Dison. (McNeill, J) |
| Filing 8 Brief re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Rick Singleton. (McNeill, J) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Rick Singleton. (McNeill, J) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Steven Carlton served on 5/18/2020, answer due 6/8/2020; David Dison served on 5/18/2020, answer due 6/8/2020; Rick Singleton served - no date of delivery on green card. (BJL) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued by the clerk and delivered via certified mail for service as to Steven Carlton, David Dison, and Rick Singleton. (AHI) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3584891 (receipt number B4601105765). related document #1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Steven Carlton, David Dison, and Rick Singleton filed by Laurie Dudley.(AHI). (Fonteneau, Kira) Modified on 5/7/2020 (BJL). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial. (AHI ) |
| Filing 3 CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Laurie Dudley (AHI) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Laurie Dudley. (AHI) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Steven Carlton, David Dison, and Rick Singleton filed by Laurie Dudley.(AHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
