Rogers v. Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
| Brittiney Rogers |
| Franklin Collection Service, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv01886 |
| November 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Liles C Burke |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Pursuant to the voluntary dismissal this action is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 1/12/2021. (AHI)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Brittiney Rogers (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed - Franklin Collection Service, Inc. served on 12/11/2020, answer due 1/1/2021. (BJL) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: For good cause shown, the Court hereby STAYS this case until January 11, 2021. If the parties have not filed for dismissal by that date, they are ORDERED to file a joint status report updating the Court on the status of the settlement. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 12/10/20. (BJL)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Brittiney Rogers of Settlement (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued by the clerk and delivered via certified mail for service as to Franklin Collection Service, Inc. (AHI ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald C Sykstus on behalf of Brittiney Rogers (Sykstus, Ronald) |
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 11/30/2020. (KBW)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for David J. Philipps and Mary E. Philipps by Brittiney Rogers. (BJL) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Brittiney Rogers. (BJL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Franklin Collection Service, Inc. filed by Brittiney Rogers. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(BJL) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3724023 (B4601109884). (Philipps, David) Modified on 12/1/2020 (AHI ). |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3724027 (B4601109885). (Philipps, David) Modified on 12/1/2020 (AHI ). |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3724021 (B4601109883). related document #1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Franklin Collection Service, Inc. filed by Brittiney Rogers. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(BJL). (Philipps, David) Modified on 12/1/2020 (AHI ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rogers v. Franklin Collection Service, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Franklin Collection Service, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Brittiney Rogers | |
| Represented By: | Ronald C Sykstus |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
