Jenkins v. University of North Alabama et al
Shequanda Lee Jenkins |
University of North Alabama, Dr. Kenneth D. Kitts, Martin Abroms, Joel Anderson, III, Wendell W. Gunn, Marcus M. Maples, Jim M. Page, Steven F. Pierce, Simpson Russell, Nancy G. Sanford, Gary L. Smith, William A. Trapp and Anne C. Whitaker |
3:2021cv01692 |
December 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Herman N Johnson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Shequanda Lee Jenkins. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Waiver, #2 Waiver, #3 Waiver, #4 Waiver, #5 Waiver, #6 Waiver, #7 Waiver, #8 Waiver, #9 Waiver, #10 Waiver, #11 Waiver, #12 Waiver)(Irby, James) |
Filing 4 ORDER: the court STRIKES Plaintiff's "Amendment to Initial Complaint" and ORDERS Plaintiff to file a full Amended Complaint, encompassing all allegations she intends to assert against Defendants, within 3 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 1/3/22. (BJL) |
Filing 3 ***STRICKEN BY DOC 4*** AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Shequanda Lee Jenkins.(Irby, James) Modified on 1/3/2022 (BJL). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment of Case to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial (AHI) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Shequanda Lee Jenkins.(AHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.