Wells v. Deere & Co
| Trinty Dale Wells |
| Deere & Co doing business as John Deere |
| 3:2022cv00074 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Liles C Burke |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Deere & Co of Motion to Transfer Related Cases for Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Gilchrist, Wesley) |
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for the defendant to respond to the complaint is extended to April 15, 2022. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 2/11/2022. (KBW)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Deere & Co. filed by Deere & Co (Gilchrist, Wesley) |
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead by Deere & Co. (Gilchrist, Wesley) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued by the clerk and delivered to plaintiff for service as to Deere & Co. (AHI) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3997954 (B4601118060). related document #1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Deere & Co filed by Trinty Dale Wells.(AHI). (Artrip, Eric) Modified on 1/21/2022 (AHI). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Deere & Co filed by Trinty Dale Wells.(AHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
