Shugars v. Americold Logistics, Inc.

Plaintiff: Lyle E. Shugars
Defendant: Americold Logistics, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2010cv01985
Filed: July 22, 2010
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Middle Office
County: Etowah
Presiding Judge: Harwell G Davis
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1343
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 28, 2012 34 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge William M Acker, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate-Judge Harwell G Davis, III no longer assigned to case, FINAL JUDGMENT in accordance with memorandum opinion, granting (docs 12 & 20) motion and amended motion for summary judgment; this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 11/28/12. (ASL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shugars v. Americold Logistics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lyle E. Shugars
Represented By: John T Robertson, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Americold Logistics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?