Noles v. Guntersville, Alabama, The City of

Plaintiff: Vesta Noles
Defendant: Guntersville, Alabama, The City of
Case Number: 4:2012cv03840
Filed: November 9, 2012
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Middle Office
County: Marshall
Presiding Judge: Robert B Propst
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 24, 2013 24 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION, as set out. Signed by Judge Robert B Propst on 4/24/13. (CTS, )
January 23, 2013 12 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Robert B Propst on 1/23/2013. (AVC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Noles v. Guntersville, Alabama, The City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vesta Noles
Represented By: Stephen W Williams
Represented By: Oliver W Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guntersville, Alabama, The City of
Represented By: George W Royer, Jr
Represented By: David J Canupp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?