Fuller v. Wheat et al
David Boy Fuller |
Wheat, Webb, Russell, Battles, Phillip, Boatwright, Klenner, Shankles, Marcano, Corizon Health Inc., McDowell, Hodge, Bell, Trucker and Paulakiovc |
4:2012cv03957 |
November 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Middle Office |
St. Clair |
T Michael Putnam |
C Lynwood Smith |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 MEMORANDUM OPINION as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 3/16/2016. (AHI) |
Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that all of plaintiff's claims in this action except his Eighth Amendment medical care and/or his retaliation claims against Dr. Pavlakovic, NursesWheat, Webb, Phillips, Shankle, Butler, Boatwright, Batt le, Kleener, and Russell and Officers Sanders, McDowell, Heflin, Zuspan, Massey, Bell, Marcano, and Hamer are DISMISSED; it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's Eighth Amendment medical care and/or his retaliation claims against Dr.Pavlakovic, N urses Wheat, Webb, Phillips, Shankle, Butler, Boatwright, Battle, Kleener, and Russell and Officers Sanders, McDowell, Heflin, Zuspan, Massey, Bell, Marcano, and Hamer are REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge C Lynwood Smith, Jr on 8/4/2014. (AHI) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.