Frazier v. Gadsden, City of
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 23, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 133 MOTION for Reconsideration as to the hourly rate ruling and DENYING 143 MOTION for Attorney Fees with leave to refile in an acceptable format no later than 5:00 p.m. on September 30, 2016. An Evi dentiary Hearing on the instatement/front pay issue is hereby set for Wednesday, October 19, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 6A in the Hugo L Black US Courthouse, Birmingham, AL before Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 9/23/2016. (JLC, )
|May 13, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING City of Gadsden's Post-Judgment and Amended Post-Judgment Motions. Alternatively, City of Gadsden's Amended Post- Judgment Motion is TERMED as MOOT. Further, Plaintiff Michael D. Frazier's Post-Jud gment Motions are GRANTED IN PART, TERMED as MOOT IN PART, and otherwise are DENIED as set out herein. Additionally, Mr. Frazier's Notice which the Court treated as a Motion to Amend his Instatement Motion is GRANTED, and any claim to Instatement is HEREBY DISMISSED or, alternatively, is HEREBY TERMED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 5/13/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Doc. 108-2 (Exhibit 2), # 2 Doc. 80-4 (Exhibit E))(JLC)
|October 2, 2014
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment, TERMED AS MOOT 23 MOTION to Strike as set out herein. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 10/2/2014. (JLC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?