Simpson v. Alabama Department of Human Resources, State of et al
| Sammy Edward Simpson, II |
| Alabama Department of Human Resources, State of, Department of Human Resources, Marshall County, Department of Human Resources, DeKalb County, Department of Human Resources, Jefferson County, Department of Human Resources, St Clair, Department of Human Resources, Etowah County, Jane Bonds, Cherri Pilkington and Dinise Raines |
| 4:2013cv01450 |
| August 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Middle Office |
| De Kalb |
| John H England |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER- The defts Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Doc 35 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as stated within this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 2/8/17. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING the 20 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation IN PART,FINDING AS MOOT 7 Motion to Dismiss in light of the 21 Amended Complaint and 23 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, DENYING 18 MOTION to recuse Judge Cornelius. This matter is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further action regarding the pending 23 Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Virginia Emerson Hopkins on 3/2/2016. (JLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
